Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 194
Filter
1.
Am J Emerg Med ; 52: 174-178, 2022 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34942426

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While multiple studies have evaluated physician-related return visits (RVs) to a pediatric emergency department (PED) limited data exists for Advanced Practice Provider (APP)-related RVs, hence our study aimed to evaluate APP-related RVs and their outcomes in a PED. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 72-h RVs where clinical care was independently provided by an APP during the index visit from January 2018 to December 2019. We extracted patient demographics, index and return visits' characteristics and outcomes. Reasons for RVs were categorized as progression of illness, medication-related, callbacks and others. Index visits were assessed for any diagnostic errors; impact of which to the patient was classified as none, minor or major. RESULTS: Our APP-related RV rate was 2.1% (653/30,328). 462 eligible RVs were included in the final analysis. Majority of RVs were for medical reasons (n = 442, 95.7%); lower acuity (Emergency Severity Index ≥3, n = 426, 92.2%); due to persistence/progression of illness (n = 403; 87.2%) with viral illness being the common diagnosis (n = 159; 34.4%). 12 (2.6%) RVs were secondary to callbacks (8 radiology callbacks; 4 false positive blood cultures). Diagnostic errors were noted in 14 (3%) encounters of which 3 resulted in a major impact; radiological (7 fractures) and ophthalmological (2 corneal abrasions and 2 foreign bodies) misses constituted the majority of these. CONCLUSIONS: APP-related RVs for low acuity medical patients remain low and are associated with good outcomes. Diagnostic errors account for a minority of these RVs. Focused interventions targeting provider errors can further decrease these RVs.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Emergency Service, Hospital/organization & administration , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Adolescent , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Child , Child, Preschool , Diagnostic Errors , Emergency Service, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Hospitals, Pediatric/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Retrospective Studies
2.
J Nurs Meas ; 29(2): 227-238, 2021 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34326204

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The Advanced Practice Nurse (APN) Council refined the APN peer review to an objective, data-driven process. The purpose of the study was to assess the interrater reliability of APN peer reviews using the APN Rubric based on Hamric, Spross & Hanson's Model of Advanced Practice Nursing. METHODS: A quantitative single-site study with a convenience sample of 80 APN Portfolios. RESULTS: Analysis of six core competencies (direct clinical practice, leadership, consultation/collaboration, coaching/guiding, research, and ethical decision-making) within the APN Rubric demonstrated substantial and near perfect agreement levels in the APN peer review process. CONCLUSIONS: The application of APN core competencies within the peer review process demonstrated high consistency, thereby increasing the significance and objectivity of peer review outcomes.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Clinical Competence/statistics & numerical data , Clinical Competence/standards , Nurse Practitioners/statistics & numerical data , Nurse Practitioners/standards , Peer Review/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Reproducibility of Results
4.
J Nurs Manag ; 29(3): 412-420, 2021 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33107099

ABSTRACT

AIM: This study aims to report on the actions and incident management of the advanced practice nurses of a disaster operation team who were deployed in response to the COVID-19 outbreak, and to explore how it illustrated the Core Competencies in Disaster Nursing Version 2.0 delineated by the International Council of Nurses in 2019. METHODS: This is a descriptive study. The participants (responders) communicated and reported their actions in the operation with headquarter on a popular social media platform in China (WeChat), established specifically for the three-rescue teams. RESULTS: The response approach of advanced nurses to COVID-19 encompassed six of the eight domains of the competencies outlined in ICN CCDN V2.0, namely on preparation and planning, communication, incident management systems, safety and security, assessment and intervention. CONCLUSIONS: The response teams of advanced practice nurses in this study clearly demonstrated their competencies in disaster rescue, which fulfilled most of the core competencies set forth by the ICN. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: The findings of this study contributed to understand the roles played by advanced practice nurses and nurse managers in disaster management and how these relate to the competencies set forth by the ICN.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/organization & administration , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/nursing , Clinical Competence/standards , Disasters , Nurse Administrators/organization & administration , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Capacity Building/organization & administration , China/epidemiology , Clinical Protocols/standards , Female , Health Care Rationing/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Mental Health , Nurse Administrators/standards , SARS-CoV-2 , Triage/organization & administration , Workflow
5.
J Nurs Adm ; 50(12): 613-615, 2020 Dec.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33181596

ABSTRACT

Registered nurses (RNs) are leaving the bedside to become advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs). Failure to successfully transition APRNs into clinical practice represents a substantial financial burden to healthcare organizations. Organizations can use the standards of the Magnet Recognition Program to help support, develop, and transition APRNs into their advanced practice role.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Inservice Training/standards , Organizational Culture , Education, Nursing, Graduate , Hospitals , Humans , Mentors
6.
Arch Psychiatr Nurs ; 34(5): 370-376, 2020 10.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33032760

ABSTRACT

The first key message in the landmark Future of Nursing report is that "Nurses should practice to the full extent of their education and training" (Institute of Medicine, 2011). Although there has been significant progress across states to remove or diminish barriers to the exercise of full scope of practice by advanced practice registered nurses (APRN), state regulations continue to unnecessarily restrict APRN practice in most of the United States. This article integrates data from studies that examine how state and local regulation affects psychiatric mental health APRN practice with the literature on how state scope of practice regulation affects the size and distribution of the broader APRN workforce, access to care, health care costs and prices, and innovation in health care service delivery. Common themes include confusion about regulatory requirements and mixed experiences of mandated physician supervision.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Nurse Practitioners/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Patterns, Nurses'/legislation & jurisprudence , Psychiatric Nursing , Scope of Practice , State Government , Health Services Accessibility/economics , Health Workforce , Humans , Scope of Practice/legislation & jurisprudence , Scope of Practice/trends , United States
8.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 32(9): 610-615, 2020 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32890037

ABSTRACT

Advanced practice nurses (APNs) now have great opportunities to serve in leadership positions for organizations, institutions of higher education, community and public agencies, and more. The need exists for APNs to have a full set of professional business documents readily available. Such common documents would extend beyond the professional business card and professional photograph to include the curriculum vitae, the resume, and the National Institutes of Health Biographical Sketch (biosketch) and a professional biosketch. Advanced practice nurses should understand the differences between the documents as each document helps to share the professional identity.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Documentation/standards , Awards and Prizes , Documentation/methods , Educational Status , Humans , Job Application , Leadership , Nurse Practitioners/education
10.
Neonatal Netw ; 39(5): 299-302, 2020 Aug 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32879046

ABSTRACT

As we approach the end of 2020, the Year of the Nurse and Nurse Midwife, it is a good time to reflect on our evidence-based practice (EBP) competencies through a review of a recent study by Melnyk and colleagues. Before describing these competencies, our progress in achieving EBP competency, and the effect competency status has on health care quality, safety, and patient outcomes, this column reviews the definition of EBP and provides a high-level overview of the steps of EBP as defined in Melnyk and Fineout-Overholt.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Clinical Competence/standards , Evidence-Based Nursing/standards , Nurses/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Quality of Health Care/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires
11.
Nurs Forum ; 55(4): 711-722, 2020 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32737887

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Given the global shortage of the health workforce and the nature of diseases, strengthening and improving health care systems become a necessity. One of the solutions that is recommended by the literature is to utilize advanced practice nurses (APNs) to accelerate the progress toward the Sustainable Development Goals and universal health coverage (UHC). PURPOSE: To delineate APN practice and competencies in relation to UHC and primary care in Jordan from the perspective of nurse administrators, clinical nurse specialist, academics, and policymakers. PROCEDURE: A descriptive exploratory survey design was utilized to identify APN competencies that are important in achieving UHC. The survey developed by one of the authors (JH) at a PAHO Collaborating Center to delineate APN practice and APN competencies was adapted and utilized. A convenience sample of 94 nurse leaders was recruited from the education sector, nursing associations, councils, and hospitals. RESULTS: The results showed that all four competencies (clinical care; interdisciplinary and patient-centered communication; systems of care; and using evidence for best practice) were rated as agree/strongly agree across all four domains. There was a consensus of participates on dimensions of all competency domains. CONCLUSION: The current study confirms that the role of APNs is still in its infancy in Jordan. The current study provides nurse educators with baseline information that can be utilized as a framework for APN education programs. The faculty readiness to start new competency-based APN programs or revise the current graduate programs needs to be assessed.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/classification , Professional Competence , Universal Health Care , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Jordan , Leadership
13.
Policy Polit Nurs Pract ; 21(2): 82-94, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32408799

ABSTRACT

Federal, state, and educational policy, as well as public and professional initiatives, should influence how care is delivered to veterans from non-Veteran Health Administration (VHA) advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs) located in civilian health care facilities. Due to the MISSION Act, more veterans are receiving care outside the VHA, but little is known about the readiness of APRNs to address the needs of this population. This mixed-methods study describes the perceptions of 340 non-VHA APRNs concerning practice, clinical needs, and challenges they face while delivering care to veterans. Survey results show only 8% of APRNs consistently asked about military service; less than 1% asked if the patient has a family member with military history; and only 25% applied research by inquiring into military history when patients presented with conditions like chronic pain, interpersonal violence, or insomnia. Technology use via mobile application was minimally reported (<1%). "Missing in Action," the overarching theme from qualitative data, included three subthemes: (a) absence facilitated collaboration with VHA, (b) concerns regarding personal competency in the care of the military person, and (c) lack of recognition of the significance of the need to know about military status. Practice implications proffered include implementation of mandatory inquiry into military service and enactment of APRN veteran-centric nursing competencies. Education actions involve updating graduate nursing programs to include veteran health content and increased policy awareness. Future research should encompass replication of this study in specific APRN roles and consist of ongoing evaluation of veteran care by the civilian sector as the MISSION Act is implemented.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Nursing Care/psychology , Nursing Care/standards , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Veterans/psychology , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , United States
14.
J Nurs Manag ; 28(4): 919-926, 2020 May.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32249469

ABSTRACT

AIM: To examine work environment differences between hospital certified nurse practitioners (CNPs) and certified registered nurse anaesthetists (CRNAs). BACKGROUND: Nurse work environments impact patient and nurse outcomes. How differing advanced practice nurse (APRN) roles influence work environments is unknown. METHODS: Multi-level cross-sectional survey design. APRNs (n = 490) completed the APRN Organizational Climate Questionnaire and Psychological Ownership Questionnaire. Nurse executives (N = 24) reported on Scope of Practice and Institutional Voice. Descriptive, t test, chi-square and linear and mixed-effects regression statistical analyses were employed. RESULTS: CNPs reported better organisational climate and job ownership than CRNAs. The largest effects involved relationships with physicians, control over practice and independent practice. Among CNPs, a significant positive relationship was observed between relations with physicians and work engagement. In CRNAs, a similar positive relationship between physician relations and work engagement was only observed for those working in higher scope of practice settings, not for those working in more restrictive settings. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist in the perceived work environments between CNPs and CRNAs that may be related to differences in job design and historical relations with physician colleagues. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Efforts to improve APRN work environments in hospital settings should consider differing CRNA and CNP perspectives.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/methods , Nursing Staff, Hospital/psychology , Perception , Workplace/standards , Adult , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Job Satisfaction , Male , Middle Aged , Nursing Staff, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Surveys and Questionnaires , Workplace/psychology , Workplace/statistics & numerical data
15.
Annu Rev Nurs Res ; 39(1): 33-51, 2020 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33431636

ABSTRACT

Simulation is used in advanced practice nursing education for both formative learning experiences and summative competency testing. However, there has been a lack of cohesive data to support the use of simulation as a replacement for direct patient care hours. This chapter presents an overview of research designs and the leveled Kirkpatrick framework used in simulation research. Research articles evaluating the effect of simulation on advanced practice learners are presented by research design and Kirkpatrick level. There is evidence that simulation has a positive impact on Kirkpatrick Level 1 (Reactions) and Kirkpatrick Level 2 (Changes in Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes). However, there is a tremendous need for evidence that simulation can impact Kirkpatrick Level 3 (Behavior) and Level 4 (Results and Outcomes).


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/education , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Curriculum , Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Simulation Training/standards , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Students, Nursing , Young Adult
16.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 32(10): 682-688, 2020 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31567778

ABSTRACT

Writing competency is increasingly recognized as imperative for advanced practice nurses (APNs) who are engaged in evidence-based practice (EBP). Writing skills are an implied expectation inherent in many APN evidence-based practice competencies, such as "formulating evidence based policies and procedures," and "communicates best evidence …." A quality improvement project was implemented for APN's within a post-Master's Doctor of Nursing Practice program, to create a novel set of low-cost, high-impact strategies that could be embedded into a program of study to improve APN writing skills. Prior work has indicated that mentorship and peer support are useful strategies that can contribute to the enhancement of APN writing skills. This study builds on prior work to develop a quantitative evaluation of a peer-supported writing intervention for APNs. Read Aloud innovation was one of two strategies chosen from among many writing improvement strategies identified in the literature because of easy implementation, even by faculty who lacked confidence in providing traditional writing instruction. If explicit development of writing competencies is not elevated to a higher priority in APN education, suboptimal writing confidence is likely to continue across the professional lifetime and will present as a recurring challenge for APNs who pursue higher educational degrees, transition into faculty roles, or seek to fully develop APN EBP competencies. Findings from this study indicate that feedback received from peers during the structured Read Aloud innovation, with emphasis on hierarchy of paragraph sentences (i.e., explicit examination for overarching quality of the leading sentence), is effective in improving clarity and brevity of writing among APNs.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Evidence-Based Practice/standards , Writing/standards , Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Education/methods , Education/statistics & numerical data , Evidence-Based Practice/statistics & numerical data , Humans , New York , Nurse Practitioners/education , Quality Improvement
17.
J Oncol Pharm Pract ; 26(1): 116-123, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31096855

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists are advanced practice providers who are highly trained and qualified healthcare professionals that can help support traditional demands on oncologists' increased time in direct patient care. The purpose of this study was to detail and assess the creation of a privileging process for this group of medical professionals within an academic medical center. Obtaining the designation of limited oncology practice provider (LOPP) gives the right to modify chemotherapy orders and to order supportive care medications. METHODS: An interdisciplinary team developed a comprehensive training process inclusive of required educational domains, knowledge goals, and educational activities to become an LOPP. In 2018, five years after the implementation of the privileging process, a survey was distributed to assess perceptions of the training process and integration of LOPPs within oncology practice. RESULTS: Most oncologists noted that working with LOPPs is beneficial to oncology practice (94%) and that they make modifying chemotherapy orders more efficient (87%). Greater than 82% of LOPPs also reported that their privileges streamline the chemotherapy process and make them feel valuable. CONCLUSION: The creation of the LOPP designation is an effective way to integrate nurse practitioners, physician assistants, and pharmacists within oncology practice. The inclusion of a focused privileging process ensures the safety of cancer care provided and has created a streamlined process for chemotherapy modifications and supportive care.


Subject(s)
Academic Medical Centers/standards , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Medical Oncology/standards , Nurse Practitioners/standards , Pharmacists/standards , Physician Assistants/standards , Academic Medical Centers/methods , Advanced Practice Nursing/methods , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Female , Humans , Male , Medical Oncology/methods , Surveys and Questionnaires
18.
Nurs Outlook ; 68(2): 155-161, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31685235

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: To-date, advocacy efforts to advance full practice authority for APRNs have primarily stressed arguments based on evidence on the cost effectiveness and quality of APRN-provided care, as well as the improved care access and patient satisfaction these providers offer. PURPOSE: The economic impact analysis forecasts the additional job and economic output associated with granting Tennessee APRNs full practice authority. METHODS: The IMPLAN software and a variety of data inputs were used to estimate the direct, indirect, and induced economic impact on jobs, labor income, value-added benefits, total output, and tax revenues. FINDINGS: From a 2017 baseline, the cumulative impact of granting Tennessee APRNs full practice authority is a net gain of 25,536 jobs and $3.2 billion in economic impact. DISCUSSION: Granting Tennessee APRNs full practice authority would confer substantial economic benefits and employment opportunities to the state.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/economics , Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Nurse's Role/psychology , Nurses/psychology , Prior Authorization/economics , Prior Authorization/statistics & numerical data , Professional Autonomy , Adult , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/economics , Tennessee
19.
J Nurs Manag ; 28(1): 82-93, 2020 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31642135

ABSTRACT

AIMS: To explore registered nurses' perceptions towards the role of advanced practice nurses and to examine registered nurses' interests in becoming advanced practice nurses. BACKGROUND: Globally, the development and implementation of advanced practice nurses have been deemed propitious. Advanced practice nurses are recruited and developed from the current pool of registered nurses. Empirical research is needed to inform practice on ensuring the sustainability of the advanced practice nurse workforce through the recruitment and development of the current population of registered nurses. METHODS: A nationwide cross-sectional online survey was conducted in Singapore. Registered nurses from all public health care institutions were surveyed. RESULTS: Respondents (n = 1,025) displayed optimism and acceptance towards advanced practice nurses. However, only 30.7% hoped to become advanced practice nurses. Nursing leaders were reported to have a low success rate in identifying registered nurses who were both suitable and interested in the advanced practice nurse role. CONCLUSIONS: Registered nurses' positive perspectives towards the role of advanced practice nurses do not translate into interests in the role. The study offers pragmatic applicability in ensuring the sustainability of the advanced practice nurse workforce. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING MANAGEMENT: Advanced practice nurse-specific residency programmes for pre-master registered nurses may be facilitative to retaining and recruiting registered nurses for the advanced practice nurse workforce.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Nurses/psychology , Perception , Adult , Advanced Practice Nursing/statistics & numerical data , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nurses/statistics & numerical data , Singapore , Surveys and Questionnaires
20.
Arch Argent Pediatr ; 117(4): S157-S174, 2019 08.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31833339

ABSTRACT

The nursing professional who treats critically ill children with cerebral injury is a key element within the pediatric intensive care team, since, through exhaustive assessment, plans nursing care in an integral manner aimed at the child and the family, and plays an essential role in the care of patients mainly at the hospital level (as well as at home). Therefore, the role played by nursing in the care of children with severe brain trauma is crucial. This guide offers nursing recommendations on neurocritical care, focusing on a systemic view based on nursing diagnoses according to the North American Nursing Diagnosis Association.


El profesional de enfermería que atiende a niños críticamente enfermos con lesión cerebral es un miembro clave dentro del equipo intensivista pediátrico, ya que, mediante la evaluación exhaustiva, planifica cuidados de enfermería de manera integral dirigidos al niño y a la familia. La enfermería como una profesión que entiende la salud de la persona humana desde una mirada integral cumple un rol esencial (indispensable) en el cuidado de los pacientes, principalmente, a nivel hospitalario (como domiciliario). Por ende, el rol que juega la enfermería en la atención de un niño con traumatismo encéfalocraneano grave es crucial en la gestión del cuidado infantil. Esta guía ofrece recomendaciones de enfermería sobre los cuidados neurocríticos focalizando una mirada sistémica basada en diagnósticos de enfermería según la Asociación Americana de Diagnósticos de Enfermería.


Subject(s)
Advanced Practice Nursing/standards , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/nursing , Consensus , Critical Care Nursing/standards , Advanced Practice Nursing/methods , Brain Injuries, Traumatic/etiology , Child , Critical Care/organization & administration , Critical Care Nursing/methods , Hospitalization , Humans , Intensive Care Units, Pediatric
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...